Optimising secondary prevention: Effect of cardiac rehabilitation duration on cardiovascular risk profile modification

Authors

  • Jessie Elliott School of Medicine, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Ireland

Keywords:

Medicine

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality in Ireland, accounting for 36% of all deaths. While it is well documented that exercise pro- grammes are of benefit in risk factor modification in the cardiac population, the optimal exercise rehabilitation programme duration remains unclear.

Study Aim: This study aimed to analyse the effect of cardiac rehabilitation pro- gramme duration on cardiovascular risk factor modification in patients with es- tablished coronary artery disease, whilst assessing the effectiveness of existing programmes.

Methods: In this retrospective, observational study, subjects (male, low risk car- diac patients, aged 50-69 years, mean age = 59 ± 4 years) were randomised into a 6-week or 8-week exercise programme. Each programme consisted of 15 exercise sessions, of 50 minute duration, with equal time distribution on each of 7 exercise stations (treadmill, cross-trainer, exercise bicycle, ball, rowing machine, arm er- gometer and weights) at 60% of maximal heart rate. During the programme, rest- ing heart rate, blood pressure, waist circumference and body mass index were monitored at regular intervals.

Results: There was no significant reduction in any of the parameters for either the 6-week or the 8-week programme. There was no significant difference be- tween the 6-week and 8-week programmes in modification of any risk param- eters.

Conclusion: This study revealed no significant difference between a 6-week and 8-week cardiac rehabilitation programme in cardiovascular risk factor modifica- tion in the cardiac population.

References

1 The Irish Heart Foundation. 50 Years of Heart Disease in Ireland; Morbidity, Mortality and Heath Services Implications, 2001.
2 WHO, Global Strategy on Diet. Physical Activity and Health, 2004.
3 WHO, World Health Report, 2003.
4 Miller TD, Balady GJ, Fletcher GF. Exercise and its Role in the Prevention and Rehabilitation of Cardiovascular Disease. Ann Behav Med. 1997 Summer; 19 (3): 220-9.
5 O’Connor GT, Buring JE, Yusuf S, Goldhaber SZ, Olmstead EM, Paffenbarger RS Jr et al. An Overview of Randomised Trials of Rehabilitation with Exercise after Myocardial Infarction. Circulation. 1989;80(2): 234-244.
6 Alter DA, Oh PI, Chong A. Relationship between cardiac rehabilitation and survival after acute cardiac hospitalization within a universal health care system. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2009 Feb;16(1):102-13. 7 Moreira MM, Souza HP, Schwingel PA, Sá CK, Zoppi CC. Effects of aerobic and anaerobic exercise on cardiac risk variables in overweight adults. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2008 Oct;91(4):200-6, 219-26.
8 Ranković G, Milicić B, Savić T, Dindić B, Mancev Z, Pesić G. Effects of physical exercise on inflammatory parameters and risk for repeated acute coronary syndrome in patients with ischemic heart disease. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2009 Jan;66(1):44-8.
9 Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Cardiac Rehabilitation Guidelines. Silver Spring, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Publishing Clearinghouse; 1995.
10 Thompson PD, Buchner D, Pina IL, Balady GJ, Williams MA, Marcus BH et al. A Statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology (Subcommittee on Exercise, Rehabilitation, and Prevention) and the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism (Subcommittee on Physical Activity) Circulation. 2003;107:3109-3116.
11 McCartney N. Role of resistance training in heart disease. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 1998 Oct;30(10 Suppl):S396-402.
12 Sparling PB, Cantwell JD, Dolan CM, Niederman RK. Strength training in a cardiac rehabilitation program: a six-month follow-up. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990 Feb;71(2):148-52.
13 Bjarnason-Wehrens B, Mayer-Berger W, Meister ER, Baum K, Hambrecht R, Gielen S; German Federation for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Recommendations for resistance exercise in cardiac rehabilitation. Recommendations of the German Federation for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2004 Aug;11(4):352-61.
14 Hansen D, Dendale P, Berger J, Onkelinx S, Reyckers I, Hermans A et al., Importance of exercise training session duration in the rehabilitation of coronary artery disease patients. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabi 2008 Aug;15(4):453-9.
15 Rivett MJ, Tsakirides C, Pringle A, Carroll S, Ingle L, Dudfield M. Physical activity readiness in patient withdrawals from cardiac rehabilitation. Br J Nurs. 2009 Feb 12-25;18(3):188-91.
16 Thompson DR, Bowman GS. Evidence for the effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 1998; 14: 38-48.
17 American Association for Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Guidelines for Cardiac Rehabilitation and Secondary Prevention Programmes. Champaign, Ill: Human Kinetics Publisher; 1999.
18 National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute. Obesity Education Initiative.
19 Hevey D, Brown A, Cahill A, Newton H, Kierns M, Horgan JH. Four-week Multidisciplinary Cardiac Rehabilitation Produces Similar Improvements in Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life to a 10-week Program, J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2003 Jan-Feb; 23(1): 17-21.
20 Reid RD, Dafoe WA, Morrin L, Mayhew A, Papadakis S, Beaton L et al. Impact of program duration and contact frequency on efficacy and cost of cardiac rehabilitation: results of a randomized trial. Am Heart J. 2005 May;149(5):862-8.

Downloads

Published

2010-01-01

How to Cite

Elliott, J. (2010). Optimising secondary prevention: Effect of cardiac rehabilitation duration on cardiovascular risk profile modification. Trinity Student Medical Journal , 11(1), Page 83–88. Retrieved from https://ojs.tchpc.tcd.ie/index.php/tsmj/article/view/1865

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.